The Malawi Police
Service (MPS) would like to introduce video surveillance technology in its
fight against crime. The chosen technology is CCTV and the dream is to install
cameras in crime hotspots in the two cities of Blantyre and Lilongwe.
At a recent
international trade fair that took place in Blantyre, the Malawi
Telecommunications Limited (MTL) exhibited the CCTV as one of their new
products on the market. The
Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of the MPS saw the exhibition and got interested
in the technology. She tasked my immediate boss to arrange for a presentation
where MTL would demonstrate to senior police officers how CCTV may be applied
in the security sector. My boss, in turn, tasked me to coordinate the meeting.
He emailed me all the communications that had taken place between him and MTL.
The presentation was
scheduled for Thursday, 4th July 2013 at MPS Headquarters in
Lilongwe. MTL installed cameras at strategic crime hotspots in Blantyre and
Lilongwe. On 2nd July I met MTL engineers and took them to the head
of Communications in the MPS so that he could show them the presentation room
so that they could finish their preparations for the meeting. Later I learned that
the MTL staff had been turned away by the MPS’s head of communications who said
that procedure had been flouted by not involving him in this project at an
earlier stage. They were advised to go back and put their request to the
Inspector General in writing. The Inspector General would then formally
instruct him to host the MTL staff and facilitate the hosting of the
presentation. This was very frustrating to MTL who had already invested lots of
time and resources into this project. I immediately informed my boss about this
development who discussed the problem with the head of communications in the
MPS and at last it was agreed that the presentation should go ahead.
Retrospectively, I have
learned an important lesson from this incident. The MTL staff would not have
been turned away had my office established communication with the head of
communications in good time. This incident clearly demonstrates that horizontal
communication between heads of different sections of an organization is key to
the success of their projects. There is little doubt that the head of
communications had done this because he felt that his office had not been
acknowledged adequately or that he had been excluded from a project that lay
squarely in his domain. The next time I am given a project to manage or a task
to do, I shall remember to identify and involve all relevant stakeholders at an
early stage. I will design a simple check list which will state the name of the
project and list all possible stakeholders and their roles in the project. This
way I will be sure not to leave out any significant stakeholders as was the case
in this incident.
No comments:
Post a Comment